Has the Coronary Angiogram been superseded by Cardiac CT?

Has the Coronary Angiogram been superseded by Cardiac CT?

When it comes to diagnosing heart conditions, medical technology has come a long way. One of the most common procedures used to assess the health of the heart is the Coronary Angiogram¹. However, in recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether Cardiac CT² has superseded the Coronary Angiogram. In this blog post, we will explore the differences between these two procedures and discuss whether the Coronary Angiogram is still the gold standard in diagnosing heart conditions.

What is a Coronary Angiogram?

A Coronary Angiogram is an invasive procedure that involves injecting a contrast dye into the coronary arteries and taking X-ray images to visualize the blood flow through the heart. It is commonly used to diagnose blockages or narrowing of the coronary arteries, which can lead to heart attacks or other heart-related problems.

What is Cardiac CT?

Cardiac CT, on the other hand, is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computed tomography to create detailed images of the heart and its blood vessels. It can provide information about the structure and function of the heart, as well as detect any abnormalities or blockages in the coronary arteries.

Advantages of Cardiac CT

Cardiac CT offers several advantages over the Coronary Angiogram. Firstly, it is a non-invasive procedure, which means that it does not require the insertion of a catheter³ into the blood vessels. This reduces the risk of complications and makes the procedure more comfortable for the patient. Additionally, Cardiac CT provides highly detailed images of the heart and its blood vessels, allowing for a more accurate diagnosis.

Limitations of Cardiac CT

While Cardiac CT has many advantages, it also has some limitations. One of the main limitations is that it exposes the patient to ionizing radiation, which can be harmful in high doses. This is especially important for patients who require frequent imaging or have a higher risk of developing cancer. Furthermore, Cardiac CT may not be suitable for patients with kidney problems, as the contrast dye used in the procedure can affect kidney function.

Is the Coronary Angiogram still necessary?

Despite the advantages of Cardiac CT, the Coronary Angiogram still has its place in diagnosing heart conditions. It remains the gold standard for assessing the severity of blockages in the coronary arteries and determining the need for invasive treatments such as angioplasty or bypass surgery. In some cases, a combination of both Cardiac CT and Coronary Angiogram may be necessary to obtain a comprehensive evaluation of the heart.

The future of heart imaging

As technology continues to advance, new imaging techniques are being developed to further improve the diagnosis and treatment of heart conditions. One such technique is fractional flow reserve computed tomography⁴ (FFR-CT), which combines Cardiac CT with computational fluid dynamics to assess the functional significance of coronary artery blockages. This innovative approach may eventually replace both the Coronary Angiogram and Cardiac CT, providing a more accurate and comprehensive evaluation of the heart.

In conclusion, while Cardiac CT has many advantages over the Coronary Angiogram, the latter still plays a crucial role in diagnosing and treating heart conditions. Each procedure has its own strengths and limitations, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs of the patient. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect further advancements in heart imaging that will revolutionize the field of cardiology.

cardiac ct



1. Coronary angiogram | Better Health Channel

2. How is a Cardiac CT performed? | Cardiac X

3. What is a catheter? | Healthy WA

4. CT Fractional Flow Reserve: A Practical Guide to Application, Interpretation, and Problem Solving | NIH

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.